I read something interesting about the literacy and electracy on a website while I did research. Maybe it is easier to understand for me and it reflects the hot topic in the modern life now: reading and young people.
“Books aren’t dead. They’re just gathering dust in the nooks and crannies of our libraries.
We know from our history, old genres never die; they just morph into new genres. The epic poem becomes the novel, the play the movie, the novel the interactive, multimedia website. Long into the future, books will be published and read. Librarians will continue to carefully catalog and archive books, preserving our civilization’s memory, culture, and thoughts. MFA programs will continue to flourish as generations of new writers will enter our writing programs, seeking the enduring permance of the literary novel or glory of the mass market paperback. Seeing green, Google and others are digitalizing our books.
In the summary of over 40 independent studies conducted by the US Department of Education and various universities, the National Endowment for the Arts concluded:
- Less than one-third of 13-year-olds are daily readers, a 14 percent decline from 20 years earlier. Among 17-year-olds, the percentage of non-readers doubles over a 20-year period, from nine percent in 1984 to 19 percent in 2004.
- On average, Americans ages 15 to 24 spend almost two hours a day watching TV, and only seven minutes of their daily leisure time on reading.
- Reading scores for 12th-grade readers fell significantly from 1992 to 2005, with the sharpest declines among lower-level readers.
- 2005 reading scores for American adults of almost all education levels have deteriorated, notably among the best-educated groups. From 1992 to 2003, the percentage of adults with graduate school experience who were rated proficient in prose reading dropped by 10 points, a 20 percent rate of decline.
As you can imagine, given ways past generations have responded to other writing technologies—from the papus, paper, pencil, pen, printing press, typewriter—we know hyperbole sells newspapers, albeit online newspapers in today’s forums, or interactive blogs. Even while he was hard at work engineering the better pencil, Henry David Thoreau argued the telegraph was a worthless technology: “x”.
Instead, Americans spend more time online reading web pages, playing interactive games, and watching videos, or authoring mixed genre mashups of web pages, video, and podcasts.
Not surprisingly, perhaps, many of our nation’s leading universities have moved some books out of the libraries to create large work spaces for students, places where teams can work collaboratively via dual monitors and comfortable work spaces or where students can sit in their cubicles, all lined up facing computers rather than each other, enabling them to sip their coffee and talk online, check their FaceBooks, and create mulitmodal compositions. Likewise, the curriculum of traditional first year composition courses at leading universities, such as Stanford, UNC Chappel Hil, are being revised to include some instruction in multimedia authoring.
Yet what is lost when the book is replaced by an interactive, multimodal web age on the Internet? What is gained when students write multimodal compositions, mashups of YouTube videos, PowerPoint slides, wiki pages, and interactive collaborative tools as opposed to using the pen/pencil and paper?
In contrast to these negative interpretations of new writing technolgoes and new writing genres, I believe Americans are not getting dumber; they are getting smarter in new ways. Fewer people are reading books not because literacy is in decline but because there are new genres, new literacies, that are more engaging, that offer writers new opportunities for originality. In short, literacy is evolving and attempts by such groups as NEA to preserve existing traditions, to put a finger in the dyke of change by offering a national reading day, are misguided and self-destructive. Rather than complaining about new standards or threats to traditions, academics and education critics need to embrace new literacy genres and ensure our educational institutions are preparing our students for contemporary literacies”.